BAGB Graduates Satisfaction Survey
A survey regarding user evaluation of graduates was conducted from 10 to 25 October 2020 via email, Google forms, and telephone to leaders or heads of departments of companies using graduates. Based on this, 24 respondents were obtained who had given their assessments from various agencies or companies, including:
Table 1. List of Stakeholder Respondents who gave their responses
|
No |
Institution |
No |
Institution |
|
1 |
PT Infomedia Solusi Humanika |
13 |
PT. Sinergi Kreasi Negeri |
|
2 |
Universitas Brawijaya |
14 |
Bumitama Gunajaya Agro |
|
3 |
Direksi PT Perkebunan Nusantara XII |
15 |
Kementerian PPN/Bappenas |
|
4 |
Kebun Pancur angkrek |
16 |
PT Pertani (Persero) |
|
5 |
PT.Agung Podomoro Land, Tbk. |
17 |
Syngenta Foundation |
|
6 |
PT Cahaya Fajar Abaditama |
18 |
Bank Negara Indonesia |
|
7 |
Bank BRI |
19 |
BNI SKC Banjarmasin |
|
8 |
Kementerian Desa Pembangunan Daerah Tertinggal dan Transmigrasi |
20 |
CV. Indosukses Jaya Makmur |
|
9 |
PT Trans Digital Media (detikcom) |
21 |
PT Mayora Indah Tbk |
|
10 |
PT. Indomobil Finance Indonesia |
22 |
PT. Trans Retail Indonesia |
|
11 |
PT. Rejoso Manis indo |
23 |
PT. KARTINI TEH NASIONAL |
|
12 |
PT Pertani (Persero) |
24 |
PT Amartha Mikro Fintek |
These companies and agencies are also engaged in different fields/industries: telecommunications, consulting, agriculture with various crops, plantations, property, banking, the ministry of PPN, BUMN, dairy drinks, publications and journalism, insurance, manufacturing, and processed food, technology retail, and finance. The evaluation carried out aims to determine the user’s assessment of graduates of the agribusiness study program based on the following components:
- Ethics
- Competence and suitability of knowledge
- Foreign Language Proficiency
- Technological ability
- Communication skills
- Ability to cooperate
- Ability to self-development
- Ability to adapt and interact in the work environment
- Critical and systematic attitude in work
- Decision making
- Leadership, and
- Assessment of the overall performance of graduates
Assessment of these components can be shown in the following diagram:
Table 2. Stakeholders Assessment of Agribusiness Study Program graduates
|
Assessment |
Percentage |
|
|||||||||||
|
Very good |
91.67 |
54.17 |
8.33 |
79.17 |
83.33 |
58.33 |
91.67 |
83.33 |
79.17 |
83.33 |
75.00 |
83.33 |
|
|
Good |
8.33 |
45.83 |
91.67 |
20.83 |
16.67 |
41.67 |
8.33 |
16.67 |
20.83 |
16.67 |
25.00 |
16.67 |
|
|
Average |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
|
Not good |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
|
Total |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
|
In general, user evaluations of graduates belonging to the good category tend to be very good, as evidenced by 20 people out of 24 respondents who considered that the overall performance of alumni was very good, and only 4 said it was good. The ethical component and the ability to self-development obtained the best ratings from users, as many as 22 institutions said it was very good, and 2 others said it was good. However, graduates and study programs need to pay attention to the components of foreign language skills possessed by graduates, only 2 institutions stated that graduates’ foreign language skills were very good, and the remaining 22 institutions each included them in the good category. The results of user evaluations of graduates can be used as a basis for developing lecture activities from an academic or non-academic perspective for students to further improve their abilities in accordance with industry demands.